ANNE FRANK DIARY
The greatest literary forgery of the twentieth century
By: RT Study Group 791
The Diary of Anne Frank called the point most sensitive of what constitutes a true "hurts industry, which revolves around the myth of the" holocaust. " The contrast of the innocent and child of the protagonist in front of their intrinsically evil captors, has made this work not only in a global best-seller (with countless editions, translations, dramatizations and film adaptations), but also in other wall of laments, where all rebuttal about the veracity of the "holocaust" is answered with a well-considered campaign of hysteria and sentimentality.
The world-renowned British historian, David Irving, the former professor at the University of Lyon 2 (France), Robert Faurisson, and the nationalized Austrian scholar Swedish Felderer Ditlieb have shown it publicly until exhaustion of the alleged falsity manuscripts attributed to a Jewish girl named Anne Frank, died in a typhus epidemic in 1944 in the Bergen Belsen.
Reportedly, the merchant Juio Otto Frank in the city of Frankfurt (Germany), fled with his family in 1933 to the Dutch city of Amsterdam, due to the rise of Hitler to power. When World War II the Germans occupied Holland, Frank decides to take refuge in a hideout to escape the "Nazi persecution." In 1944, the whole family is arrested and deported by the Gestapo, being the only "survivor" Otto Frank, who was sent to Auschwitz, where instead of being "gassed", is hospitalized because of an illness. After the war, Frank returned to Amsterdam where he delivered the originals of the Journal and published his first Dutch edition in 1947.
In this note, we will make consideration of the reader the main arguments and doubts exist about the authenticity and veracity of what is contained in the Journal. Importantly, it has always been used as the most effective blow against the Zionist propaganda German National Socialism. Testing and fundamentals
In an article by researcher Henry Aynat Eknes, published in English Revision, are the main arguments that cite here. We emphasize that this work is based Eknes the Felderer Dietleb excellent book entitled "Anne Frank's Diary, a Hoax" ("The Diary of Anne Frank, a lie.") We will stop first in external analysis of the manuscript, and then introduce in the text itself.
Above all, know that the study does a historian of a document, such as a personal journal, is done very carefully, with a detailed description of their external characteristics such as size, paper type, number of leaves, number of pages written, blanks, item writing, multiple binding and more details. This allows to verify, among other things, if it really was with the time and place assigned to it, and not fall naively fraud. This painstaking work, truly scientific, is anyone's, until the arrival of the revisionists, had made the documents linked to the events of the Second World War. Concerning
called Diary of Anne Frank is necessary to know that:
1. With significant obstinacy, Otto Frank (died 1980), provided He refused to let the manuscript was subjected to exhaustive analysis in order to verify its authenticity.
2. In 1980, following a lawsuit against Ernst Roemer, a retired seventy-six who dared to deny the authenticity of the Journal, "the German Legal Defense Fund achievement at the request of Dr. Rieger that the Federal Criminal Department submitted to analysis of texts and I note that some of them were written with pen, an invention introduced in 1951, ie, at least seven years after the death of Anne Frank.
3. However, twenty years before, in 1960, the calligraphy expert Minna Becker court had ruled that all manuscripts came from the Journal single calligraphy. So who did the script laid the aggregates with pen ... which in plain terms means that ANA FRANK WAS NOT THE AUTHOR'S DIARY.
4. One of the evidence presented by David Irving, was the contrast between two documents, one containing the authentic handwriting of Anne Frank, corresponding to the letters sent by her in the same period, and another with the annotations of the Journal, whose handwriting that is not correspond at all with the girl of thirteen.
5. A pamphlet of "Anne Frank Foundation in Amsterdam", says Dutch friends of the family found an exercise book with cardboard covers and small size. The Swedish newspaper Expressen 10 October 1976, published a photograph of Otto Frank holding a considerable volme that looks nothing like the book referred to.
with the text itself, this is a sea of \u200b\u200bcontradictions. Felderer historian makes some careful observations that allow to point out:
6. It is hardly credible that in a narrow shelter, where they remained for nearly two years, none of the eight people who were in it know that Anne Frank was writing a diary during that period (June 1942 - August 1944). The father says he learns after returning from Auschwitz.
7. The need for silence in the shelter, not to attract attention and avoid being captured (03/23/1943) contrasted with the descriptions of the "terrifying fights" (02/09/1942), "outrageous fights," "screams and screams, beatings and insults that would not imagine" (10/29/1943), and the pr Just about Ana dance every night (1/12/1944).
8. Curiously, according to the Journal, that Frank to escape the persecution they have chosen the same offices and warehouse of Otto Frank himself to hide (09/07/1942).
9. It is also contradictory when he says Lewin, "a small Jewish farmacetico chemist and works for Mr. Kraler in the kitchen" (10/01/1942). ocom?, ØA Jews working peacefully when it is intended that the Jews suffer a brutal persecution by the authorities? ...
10. Are revealing, says E. Aynat, the sexual proclivities of this girl from ° thirteen years!: "I remember when I stayed with a friend, I felt a strong desire to kiss her ... I could not help being terribly inquisitive about their bodies ... I asked If, as proof of our friendship, we could pat each other's breasts, but I refuse. I get to ecstasy every time I see the naked figure of a woman, as Venus, for example. It affects me so that I can hardly keep me the tears fall. ° If only I had a girlfriend! " (01/05/1944)
Finally, ØA some pornography for a better sale? ... Ø It is the language and concerns of a girl of thirteen years? ... OES is a healthy girl? ...
11. According to an interview with Otto Frank in 1956, the blinds were always low and the windows never opened, but Anne says that looking at the sky "is better than pills Valeria and bromine (15/06/1944), anti-anxiety depression.
12. Finally, it is clear the purpose of this Paper: the germanofobia says: "They will be allowed all civilized languages, except German" (17/11/1942). "The Germans are the most cruel beasts that have walked the face of the earth" (19/11/1942).
This has not prevented the authorities "German" of postwar Journal as having introduced the book required reading in schools, self-loathing of the new generations.
The Institute for Historical Review of the United States (IHR), again offered U.S. $ 25,000 .- for reward to anyone who can prove that the Diary of Anne Frank was written by her. Neither the Foundation established itself on the fraud claim literary encourage generous offer.
øQuién cries for these children?
would like to close this note, which only has illustrated the main details of this huge lie ad-with the accurate words of the British revisionist Richard Harwood, who by the way the newspaper said:
"It fair to say that the considerations that we present are somewhat lazy. In fact, does not matter that the Journal is false or true. Any suffering of a Jewish girl of twelve years are more significant by the fact that he kept a journal, that much or more terrible sufferings of other Jewish children, or the misfortunes of the infinitely more numerous children German, Italian, Japanese, Polish or other nationalities who have suffered horribly, mangled or burned, maimed or handicapped for life because of the allied bombing of open cities, abandoned in the chaos by the death or disappearance of their fathers, raped or corrupted by the barbarity of enemy troops. OPERA Who remembers these horrors?, øQUIEN CRY FOR THE NI-O ALEM N HOWL WRAPPED THAT RUNS THE LIQUID PHOSPHORUS unquenchable fire?, Oquin BY THE GERMAN GIRL RAPED TO DEATH BY A SUCCESSION OF BEASTS?, oo JAPANESE CHILDREN OF HIROSHIMA AND NAGASACKI
?..." "Because of all these countless heinous cases nobody speaks. There is no best-sellers, no drama, no 40 editions, there is no cinema, no theater, no radio or television. The falsity of the myth of Anne Frank goes far beyond, is a lot deeper than the possible falsification of the text. Lies in the unilateral and the endless recurrence of the issue. A kind of Ravel's Bolero of propaganda, a perfect political implementation of the old theme of the innocent girl trapped by evil, but wins an after death: White persecuted by the wicked stepmother, the weak maiden imprisoned in the medieval tower or the innocent heroine in the films of the Far West the cow-boy good saves in the final ride. And so, the myth of Anne Frank, by force of its impact on the collective sensibility, becomes not only a symbol of the innocent persecuted nation, but more an and against all rules of logic, in indisputable proof of evil intrinsic, irredeemable, the pursuers ... "
RT 791 Study Group
---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -
The Association of Former Amateur Stories of War and the Holocaust (aaargh), offers this text in Internet educational purposes only, to encourage research, not commercial interests and in order to use restraint. The address of the Secretariat is
provide a text on the screen of the Web is equivalent to putting a paper on the shelves of a public library. It costs us some money and work. We think it's the volunteer reader that takes advantage of this and assume that is capable of thinking for himself. A reader will find a document on the Web always does face the consequences for themselves. As the author of a document, there is no reason to suppose that shares responsibility for the other texts that can be found on the same site. By reason of the laws that codify a specific censorship in some countries (Germany, France, Israel, Switzerland, Canada, and others), do not solicit the agreement of the authors residing in these countries, they are not free to agree conditions for .
We stand under the protection of Article 19 of the Declaration of Human Rights, which states:
----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ---
aaarghinternational@hotmail.com
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
the origins and consequences of the Nuremberg Trials before the International Military Tribunal. The text was also published as a circular letter in order to offer the residents of Seneca Street in Barcelona about the possibility of verifying other information to compensate for the unilateral already received so far from the "Civic Platform Anne Frank" and other professional political victimization. It is also the only text written by Pedro Varela, among all those included in the indictment against him has collected the Catalan autonomous police and prosecutors, which could be drawn from personal opinions, despite citing sources at all times information. The Attorney General of Catalonia, Mr. Mena, believes that the "case Varela", "seeks to hate and not an ideology." It should ask Mr. Mena and all the readers who are now within reach this "smoking gun" when did this research indicates Pedro Varela hatred of any kind?. Read and decide for yourself.
THE CASE OF ANNE FRANK 
The myth, or should we say the scam of Anne Frank?, Is probably both at once, soon after the research we have summarized the matter. Known worldwide for its famous diary, Anne Frank is without a doubt the "Holocaust victim" most celebrated. In terms of its impact on the public "Says the" Nazi hunting "Jewish Simon Wiesenthal," the Diary of Anne Frank is "more important than the Nuremberg trials" (The Washington Post, April 1, 1979, pg. H3) (1).
The myth, or should we say the scam of Anne Frank?, Is probably both at once, soon after the research we have summarized the matter. Known worldwide for its famous diary, Anne Frank is without a doubt the "Holocaust victim" most celebrated. In terms of its impact on the public "Says the" Nazi hunting "Jewish Simon Wiesenthal," the Diary of Anne Frank is "more important than the Nuremberg trials" (The Washington Post, April 1, 1979, pg. H3) (1). organizations influence and most Western media, promote an almost religious cult of Anne Frank. The UK Monthly History Today (March 1995 edition) states that "The impact of the 'Journal' has been immense, especially in the younger generations, school children, teenagers and students. In Germany developed a kind of cult of Anne Frank in the fifties similar to the movements awakened by Santa Teresa and St. Bernadette. In 1957, the mass excitement was channeled into a journey of two thousand young men from Hamburg to Bergen-Belsen, even raining during the ceremony in which they placed flowers on the graves, one of which was buried Anne Frank "(2). But the truth is that the case of Anne Frank is no different from many other Jews subject to the policy of anti-Semitic measures in time of war taken by the Axis powers, not least justified by the declaration of war that the Jewish nation made against Germany in 1933, ie six years before the war started (3).
As part of the evacuation of Jews from Western Europe the 14 year old girl and other family members were moved by train from Holland to the labor camp of Auschwitz-Birkenau (now in southern Poland). Several weeks later, before the advancing Soviet army, along with many other Jews, was deported by train to Auschwitz evacuated more than 400 kms. west direction, to the Bergen-Belsen in northern Germany.
was there along with other colleagues in the field, Anne fell ill with typhus, a disease from which he died in mid-March 1945. Was not executed or murdered. Anne Frank died, like millions of non-Jews in Europe during the final months of conflict, such as another indirect victim of the most devastating war. His father, Otto Frank, also fell ill with typhus and was transferred by Germany to the Auschwitz infirmary, where he recovered. Finally he formed part of the thousands of Jews there were weak or sick to leave the Germans on the field, in January 1945 when the Soviets overran it. Otto Frank died in Switzerland in August 1980. But if he was actually German policy of killing Anne Frank and her father would never have survived Auschwitz. Appropriate, any tragedy that might be considered not worthy distorted by political and economic interests. The claim of self-described herself "Pro Street Platform Anne Frank", "proposed for this street-Seneca Street renamed Anne Frank, with a brief notation that stresses its status as a symbol of the Holocaust" does not have standing, as we shall see.
The first casualty of the war was the truth, whose distortion was used as a weapon of psychological warfare. "I do not know how much longer can we maintain that the Germans are killing Jews in gas chambers. Is a grotesque lie, as the Germans in World War I produced butter with the corpses of their enemies" ... "It's a lie that can endanger our propaganda." This was the response of the head of British propaganda to Winston Churchill, discouraging sign the charge against Germany, given by the PWE (Political Warfare Executive), English department responsible for "psychological warfare." The idea was taken up initially as the rumors spread by Poles and Jews in August 1942. "The 'Foreign Office' soon realized that this was a lie, as the Poles and Jews were always lying to predispose to England against Germany" (4). Despite the PWE decided to use and expand these stories as a basis for the propaganda war against the Germans. It is within this context of "psychological war" and "propaganda of atrocities" which is to frame the story of Anne Frank.
But not only. As indicated by Felderer (5) at the time not only served to demonize Hitler and Nazi Germany, has also proven useful to the cause of the Israelis in the Middle East, giving the impression that his claims were legitimate Palestinian. Anne was the symbol of Jewish children persecuted. Harwood adds that this and similar stories, we have tried to intimidate all nationalism (6), from that time whenever criminal suspect, for internationalism useful to the claims of high finance a world government.
WHO WAS THE AUTHOR OF "NEWSPAPER"?
is said that "initially, the publication of the Journal was rejected by numerous publishers" (7). Since 1952, when it was first published in Paris-the first Dutch edition appeared in the summer of 1947 (8) - have made more than fifty editions in all major languages, accounting for far more than 25 million copies sold (9), many of them forcibly (10), to mention a Hollywood blockbuster film, theater and numerous adaptations transmitted by radio and television. It aims to be the real diary of a Jewish girl from Amsterdam, 12 old, written during the German occupation, while he hid with his family in a house funds, were subsequently arrested (August 4, 1944) and taken to concentration camps where Anne Frank died at age 14, in March 1945, victims of a typhus epidemic that swept the area (11).
point out here that the arrest of Frank took out the Dutch police (Police Verde) and Anne was taken first to the transit camp for Jews deported from Westerbork (Netherlands), subsequently, on September 2, 1944, the labor camp Auschwitz-Birkenau and in December the same year Bergen-Belsen (12), where the end of the war and the inherent chaos caused by Allied bombing on cities and the media and supplies would lead to starvation and typhus. That is to say that was paraded around Europe. One wonders if all this did not imply an effort to lose the war, because in a time of greatest need, the Germans were engaged in transferring prisoners from enemy nations from field to field, resulting in low fuel consumption was kick in the front and use of many trains useful in other pursuits. And if the intention of the Germans was "to exterminate the Jewish population, nor is understood that Anne spent three months in Auschwitz without be "gassed" to be transferred to Bergen-Belsen, in no case was a death camp (according to the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Munich, the German government paraoficial their institution, or Bergen-Belsen nor in all the former territory of the Reich existed gas chambers for the extermination of human beings) (13). Let us add that the father, Otto Frank, was hospitalized at Auschwitz to be cured of their ailments (14). Is in any case surprising that German interest for theoretically intended to enter the gas chamber in her enjoying health. According
Otto Frank, the diary was found by chance, by himself, hidden in a cavity which, coincidentally, was between the beam and the roof of the place where they had been held, before falling into German hands. That chance encounter occurred, according to Otto Frank, well after the war ended in 1952 (15), although this date does not coincide with the publication of the first edition (1947) (16). Wolfgang Benz (44) the diary was found by Miep Gies, a neighbor of the Franks in the Prinsengracht 263, Amsterdam, the same 4. 8. 44, day of the arrest. It is said that Anne Frank wrote her diary in secret. So says in his foreword George Stevens, who claims not only that the paper was small, but "that only the small diary Anne was aware "(17).
Here a problem arises, how is that a book which, according to editions, has some 230, 240 or 290 pages can be included in a small journal that could be hidden behind a school notebooks? Despite being in a relatively small loft, none of the attendant saw her writing (18), which continues to be difficult, considering that it was a voluminous letter. Other authors do not agree on this point (19). According to historian J. Bochaca Catalan, a twelve year old girl type, on the second page of his diary, an essay ontological philosophical about the reasons that drive to do so, and as a young girl is able to write a history of the Frank family, without notes to the eye, that is confined in an attic to current legislation and anti-Jewish measures of the "Nazis", including dates, numbers and names decrees, is an odd case in the history of world literature (20).
The same author notes that the English and German editions of the diary so fundamentally different that the differences can not be attributed rationally criteria translator. The truth about Anne Frank's diary was revealed initially by the Swedish publication "Fria Ord, in 1959, a series of newspaper articles published in March. In April of that year, the American magazine "Economic Council Letter" (April 15, 1959) summarized the items in your Swedish colleague, with the following press release: "History provides many examples of myths that have a richer life and longer than the truth, and that certainly can become more effective than the truth "(21).
Our doubts are increased when we read in the New York Times "on October 2, 1955, in the diary of Anne Frank" only about 150 entries included "which were recorded" chronologically the feelings and impressions of a teenager " ("Mommy sometimes treats me like a baby, so I can not stand") and "in addition very few that can not be regarded as belonging to that category" ("I greatly fear that we discover and we shot") (22). Nevertheless, continued Richard Harwood, the "Journal" has published 293 pages and the text is not consistent with the relationship, just cited, among numerous inscriptions typical of a teenager and "very few" of varying political reference. In fact, not only the political comments of the newspaper, but its general content and style, presuppose an understanding of historical relationships, trial and art of expression rare even among adults. The edition "original" of the Journal was never published, since the father, Otto Frank decided to expunge the same rough fragments of a critical adolescent or the mother of Anne. Later this had to admit that besides the Jewish writer and Isa Anneliese Schütz Cauven "to fill gaps in the diary should require the services of Dutch journalist Albert Cauven" (23). Even little suspicious weekly "Der Spiegel", the main instrument in the "reeducation" of the German people had to admit that "the 'Journal' as a whole is not authentic." For Spiegel is clear that "what has been exciting the world, does not come entirely the hand of Anne Frank. In editing the 'Journal' has been transformed by numerous manipulations ... "(24). The official investigation conducted by Dr. Hübner follows that the diary consists of 177 published chapters (letters) coming from four different sources: 4 Diary, 5 of a book of short stories, 69 of two newspapers that Dr. Hübner defined as the first development of the Journal, 99 sheets from which the researcher defines as a second production of the Journal.
MEANINGFUL TRIAL
Major suspicion assail us, of course, to study the litigation in which they engaged the well-known American Jewish writer Meyer Levin Anne Frank's father. The trial took place between 1956 and 1958 before the County Court House in New York City, the applicant Meyer Levin obtaining a ruling in their favor condemning Otto Frank to pay compensation of $ 50,000 at the time for "fraud, violation of contract and illegal use of ideas, "the lawsuit, which was arranged privately after the sentence for obvious mutual interest, was on the" scenic dramatization "and sale of the" Journal. " The judge, likewise a Jew, was Samuel L. Coleman, who ruled in the sense that Otto Frank Meyer Levin was to pay "for his work in the diary of Anne Frank" (25).
For anyone interested, everything about the Levin-Frank case is filed in the Office of the County of New York (NY Country Clerk's Office) under the number 2241-1956 and in the New York Supplement II, 170 Series and 5 Series II 181 (26) . Thus, the judge's ruling, and Jewish judge in the sense that the author of the Journal is Meyer Levin, not the child, there is (27).
What it should be noted is that from reading the numerous private correspondence of Otto Frank and Meyer Levin that was contributed to the trial as evidence of the parties, it is a serious presumption "rebuttable" that the "Journal" is substantially a forgery "(28), and that the perpetrator of the forgery was also Jewish Meyer Levin. Levin, in legitimate defense of copyright, in addition to sue Mr. Frank for four or five million dollars for his work of paraphrasing the manuscript "to the end that had to meet ...", also litigated against the producer Bloombarden Kiermit film because the film-the same title as the play-scenes also appear written by him and were not contained in the original Journal (29).
Meyer Levin had been a correspondent in Spain during the civil war from 1936 to 1939 and later sent to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency during clashes with Palestinians between 1945 and 1946. The Encyclopaedia Judaica recognized as "the first writer in staging the Diary of Anne Frank (1952) "(Vol. 11, pg. 109) (30).
The unexplained miracle of changing Anne Frank letter
in two documents dated the same year: the famous
"diary" (above) and a letter to a friend (below).
A PREMATURE PEN
But not just here all, and certainly makes our disappointment when we discovered, as did the British historian David Irving after his research (31), which in the diary of Anne Frank had ink pen. Determined so few experts who came expressly to Switzerland to check the original manuscript in the possession of Otto Frank. According to these, some of the papers had been written in pen, invented in 1949 and whose appearance in the data market as early 1951 - something impossible to be Anne Frank died of typhus (32) in 1945. Two Germans, Edgar Geiss and Ernst Roemer, publicly put into question once again, the authenticity of the famous "Diary." Given this, the Hamburg District Court instructed the German Federal Criminal Office (BKA) examination of the texts to determine scientifically if their writing had been out during the years 1941 to 1944, based on the analysis of the role and writing the original manuscript. This chemical-technical analysis was conducted in April 1981 under the direction of Dr. Werner (33).
Despite its publication, the law of silence of the mass-media "tried to give the least possible publicity to the results of the analysis. It did the New York Post "on October 9, 1980 stating the fact.
According to this analysis, corrections, comments and additions in the leaves of the manuscript were made in blue, black, red pencil and black ink, green and blue. As the main text comments are of the same hand, remember, the book was written by someone after the war or at least after the race finished it. The original consists of three bound notebooks and 324 loose pages (34)
Playing the article "New York Post" on 9.10.1980 where
confirms that Anne Frank could not have ink pen writing
his diary, because I still had not been invented the pen!
DIFFERENCES IN WRITING A calligrapher could see also it was all written by the same hand and therefore could not be that of Anne Frank. This is Minna Becker, Jewish calligrapher expert, who told the judge repeatedly that all journal writing belongs to the same hand (35). To squander this issue has only been necessary to access the authentic letters that Anne Frank wrote of girl friends, she published in the United States point of these cards do have the normal appearance of a 10 or 12 years, is not the case of the original manuscript, which reveal an older author. The letters were purchased by the "Simon Wiesenthal Institute" and as long as David Irving, they are authentic not the day (36). Bochaca also confirms, as others have done subsequently, referring to Paul Rassinier, that writing is stated is that of Anne Frank, reproduced in the book "Spur eines Kindes", by Ernst Schnabel, totally different from the writing of Anne Frank in the original manuscript.
Professor Faurisson of the University of Lyon, whose specialty is the criticism of texts and documents, and had several personal conversations with the father of Anne Frank, insists on this subject giving sufficient weight to lead to skepticism about the " diary "of Anne Frank. His first work on the case was published in French in 1980. A translation of it appeared in the summer of 1982 in the volume of "The Journal of Historical Review" titled "Is the Diary of Anne Frank genuine?" (Pages 147 to 209). Then pointed to two examples of the handwriting attributed to Anne Frank, both written when it had about 13 years, but strangely the first (dated June 12, 1942) seems much more mature and similar to that of an adult who allegedly written Only four months later (10. 10. 42). In response to this skepticism about the authenticity of the diary, the State Institute for War Documentation in Amsterdam (Rijksinstituut voor Orloogsdocumentatie - RIOD), published a book in 1986 which included a facsimile of a letter allegedly written by Anne on July 30, 1941.
The discovery in the U.S. several other examples of the handwriting was announced in 1988. It included two letters dated 27 and 29 April 1940 and a postcard written to someone in Danville (Iowa). The latter, like those of 12. 6. 1942 and 10. 10. 1942, created a new problem to the Institute for War Documentation in Amsterdam, because the handwriting that appears in them is completely different than the adult writing the letter of July 30, 1941, and most of the manuscript question. These findings confirm the belief of Prof. Robert Faurisson of the handwriting of "adult" attributed to Anne is actually very similar to the handwriting of a person who officially "helped" Otto Frank to prepare the diary for publication after the war.
For Maria Paz Lopez and his article in "La Vanguardia", these differences are normal writing (!) In an adolescent. Also ignores, in addressing the issue of the expert report commissioned by the RIOD, the subject of writing in pen, mentioning only the annotations in pencil from the father. We conclude therefore that this is not a diary but a novel, based on a manuscript written after the war by Otto Frank and his staff, and written by Meyer Levin, with some later additions Albert Cauven Dutch (38). The German historian Udo Walendy is definitive: "The Diary of Anne Frank" for years recommended reading for school and public taboo "is a forgery" (39).
ANNE FRANK A FORCE
should be noted here that for the avoidance of doubt and debunk the growing suspicions about the authenticity of the book, was imposed by the current German authorities as required reading in schools (amazing deal for rights holders -Anne Frank Fund, and editors!) and went so far as disciplinary action (removal of the "leave docendi") against teachers who dare to express their doubts about (40). Professor Stielau, Hamburg, was expelled from his teaching job in 1957, by the mere fact of having dared to question the authenticity of the Journal. Incredible!.
late as 1976, Anne's father, Otto Frank, takes actions and complaints against Heinz Roth of Odenhausen in a trial aimed to ban publications which support the paper, as published, there can be written by a girl of 12 years. These examples demonstrate how narrow is the margin of freedom of thought when brushed certain taboo subjects (41). A MORAL TIMO
Richard Verrall (who publishes under the pen name of Harwood) warns that the falsity of the myth Anne Frank goes far beyond, is far deeper than the possible falsification of the text. Lies in the "unilateralism" and the "infinite recurrence" of the item: a perfect policy implementation of the current propaganda of the old theme of the innocent child caught in the unique evil of others, but even after death triumphs. The myth of Anne Frank, by force of its impact on the collective sensibility, becomes not only a symbol of the "innocent" persecuted Jewish nation, but even more so and against all rules of logic, "indisputable proof" of the intrinsic evil, immeasurable, of the persecutors.
's face Suddenly, in effect, no matter from a human point of view the diary of Anne Frank is a forgery or not. This girl died of typhus victims, not a "gas chambers" non-existent in Bergen or converted into "bar soap" which have proved a fallacy, it must be said, "and the suffering and death of any child is always regrettable. But it is important to note that the potential suffering of a Jewish girl of 14 years, in time of war, there are more significant for the "fact" that a newspaper had written that the terrible suffering as much or more other potential Jewish children; or infinitely more numerous misfortunes of other children German, Italian, Japanese, Poles, Russians and other nationalities who have suffered horribly for many other reasons in the same war torn, burnt alive for millions, maimed or disabled for life because of the massive bombing of civilians carried by the Allies against German open cities, abandoned in the chaos before the death or disappearance of their parents violated, corrupted by the barbarity of many of the troops. Only in the German Holocaust of Würzburg, during the last days of the war, 5,000 people were burned, among which over 100 girls and women were called Anna, turned into ashes during the night of 16 March 1945 (44).
But who remembers such a sum of horrors suffered by non-Jews? Who cries for the German child, in Dresden, along with another 250,000 civilians, mainly women and children, runs howling involved in the unquenchable fire of liquid phosphorus? Who by the German girl repeatedly raped to death by a succession of animated beasts upon them by the Soviet Jew Ilya Ehrenburg? Who writes novels tear gas by the no less real and innocent Japanese children of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Who by the children of the same age as Anne Frank, massacred in Paracuellos del Jarama, in its own country does not have a street?. Nobody.
There is no "best sellers" for them, no "drama" or 50 editions, or movie, or theater, or bombardment of television, mass media campaigns on their behalf, and collected signatures, or movements between political parties and its parliamentary system, public demonstrations or fifty years later, no one who wants to remind you to change the name of a street, however small it is out. Why? Perhaps because he does not have a lobby that makes the pain an unprecedented business? Why should they lack the orchestration of the "mass media" which makes the suffering of others as a political weapon, with intent morally disarm those who denounce such hypocrisy? Or should we be more daring and say that just because they are Jews?. Then should also report and prosecute those who for money or dark political and personal interests do, with children who have suffered in the past, discrimination on grounds of race, religion or political views of parents and only remember a very specific and minority children, bypassing others. This is certainly an unfairness.
STREET FOR A GIRL OR A FAKE?
"Bergen City Council deny the name of Anne Frank to a street." Indeed "La Vanguardia reported a similar case in point with the poor Seneca, during the attempted imposition of a" Street Anne Frank "in the city of Bergen, in whose municipality was the Bergen-Belsen, and whose council has flatly refused to give the name of Anne Frank to the street leading to the camp memorial. The proposal was made after years ago tried unsuccessfully to give this name to a school (42). However, between May 12, 1995 and Fall 1996, calling themselves "Civic Platform (!) Anna Frank" bombed the 230 families living in Barcelona Seneca Street to the request for change of name and signature collection therefore to seek their support in such nonsense and make such a swap of the City Council and Municipal Council of the District.
But apart from the head of a paper printed letters and some marginal groups, the demonstrations are by no means numerous and much less representative of the citizens of Barcelona or the residents of Seneca Street. A man becomes a millionaire at the expense of her daughter, killed by passing as the author of a novel she has written. And on top must be put before the courts to pay the true author. Journalist Gil Mugarza rightly recommends that the most decent and appropriate in relation to the unfortunate girl, oblivious to all that has been a lucrative publishing success and a huge political and economic success for the Zionist cause, is simply to let her rest in peace. It is unfortunate that the young, many decades after his death, must be sacrificed again, again and again, a victim of speculation that use the dead to comfort and distraction of the living. Pedro Varela
NOTES (1) and (2) WEBER, Mark: Anne Frank. Published in The Journal of Historical Review, May / June 1995, pg. 31. (3) "Daily Telegraph" 24.3.1933 and "Daily Express" of the same date. (4) IRVING, David: Evidence against the Holocaust. Conference at the Hotel Majestic, Barcelona, \u200b\u200b17 November 1989 (5). Felderer Ditlieb: Il Diario di Anna Frank: A Frode. Edizioni La Sfinge, Via Marchesi, 30, Parma (Italy), 1990, pg. 6. (6) Harwood, Richard (Richard Verrall): Six Million Really Die?. Historical Review Press, England, 1977. (7) Encyclopaedia Judaica, cited in Felderer opus. cit. Page 14. (8) BENZ, Wolfgang: "Legenden, Lügen, Vorurteile: Ein Wörterbuch zur Zeitgeschichte." DTV Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag. 2 nd Edition, 1992 and Felderer, pg. 13: Brockhaus Encyclopedia, Vol (6-450). (9) PAZ LOPEZ, Maria: The girl who was inexplicable. "La Vanguardia" in Barcelona on Wednesday day 03/15/1995, pg. 2, "Journal." According BENZ opus. cit., this figure 1992 was 16 million. (10) Bochaca, J.: The Myth of Anne Frank. Cedade Journal No. 170 of March 1989. Pp. 18 to 20. (11) Anne Frank "Diary" a fake. Published in "Holocaust News" No. 1, pg. 3, the Centre for Historical Review. PO Box 446, London SE23 2LS. Also Enci. Judaica page. Felderer 53 and op. cit. (12) Encyclopaedia Judaica, pg. 53. Jerusalem, Israel, 1971-1972. (13) ROTH, Heinz: Anne Frank's Tagebuch, ein Schwindel., 1979. (14) Encyclopaedia Britannica. Cited by Felderer (15). Bochaca, opus cit. (16) and (17) Felderer opus. cit. pg. 13, pg. 22. (18) Bochaca, opus cit. (19) PAZ LOPEZ, Op. cit. (20) Bochaca, J.: The Myth of Anne Frank. Cedade magazine p.18-20 (21). Bochaca, J.: The myth of six million. Ed Bausp, Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1978, pg. 100. (22) HARWOOD, Op. cit. (23) Bochaca, Op. cit. and Felderer, Op. cit. p. 14. (24) Quoted in "Kommentare zum Zeitgeschehen." Folge 269. September 1993, p. 65. (25), (26), (27) and (28) Bochaca, J.: The Myth of Anne Frank. Cedade magazine. Pp. 18 to 20. (29) GIL Mugarza, Bernardo: Requiem by Anne Frank .. "Up" 09/05/1959 (30). Felderer opus. cit. P. 15. (31) IRVING, David: Evidence against the Holocaust. Hotel Majestic, Barcelona, \u200b\u200b11.17.1989 (32). PAZ LOPEZ, opus cit. (33) Bochaca, Op. cit. (34) "New York Post" on October 9, 1980. (35) Bochaca opus cit. (36) IRVING, Op. cit. (37) See Faurisson, Prof. Robert: Anne Frank's Handwriting. Published in "The Journal of Historical Review, Volume Nine, Number One, Spring 1989. P. 97 to 101. IHR, California 92627. Tests caligráficas.Y Vol. 3, No. 2, summer 1982: "Is the Diary of Anne Frank genuine?" and "Le Journal d'Anne Frank est-il authentique? in "Vérité Historique ou Vérité Politique?" (38) Bochaca, Op, cit. (39) ROTH, Heinz: Anne Frank's Tagebuch, ein Schwindel. Odenhausen, July 1979 (40). Bochaca, opus cit. (41) HARWOOD, Op. cit. (42) GIL Mugarza, opus cit
0 comments:
Post a Comment